"Fundamentalism" and "authoritarian secularism" are commonly perceived as the two mutually exclusive paradigms available to Muslim majority countries. Recent political developments, however, have challenged this perception. Formerly associated with a fundamentalist outlook, mainstream Islamist groups, such as the Muslim Brotherhood and Al-Nahda, have adopted a distinctly secular-democratic approach to the state re-building process. Their success or failure in transitioning to democracy remains to be seen, but the political position these Islamic groups have carved out suggests the viability of a third way.

Naser Ghobadzadeh examines the case of Iran, which has a unique history with respect to the relationship of religion and politics. The country has been subject to both authoritarian secularization and authoritarian Islamization over the last nine decades. While politico-religious discourse in Iran is articulated in response to the Islamic state, it also bears the scars of Iran's history of authoritarian secularization-the legacy of the Pahlavi regime. Ghobadzadeh conceptualizes this politico-religious discourse as "religious secularity". He uses this apparent oxymoron to describe the Islamic quest for a democratic secular state, and he demonstrates how this concept encapsulates the complex characteristics of the Shiite religious reformation movement.

Amazon > Books > Specialty Boutique > New, Used & Rental Textbooks > Social Sciences > Political Science

Amazon > Books > Specialty Boutique > New, Used & Rental Textbooks > Humanities > Religious Studies > Islam

Amazon > Books > Subjects > Politics & Social Sciences > Politics & Government > Specific Topics > Political Freedom

Amazon > Books > Subjects > Religion & Spirituality > Religious Studies > Church & State

Amazon > Books > Subjects > Religion & Spirituality > Islam

Amazon > Books > Subjects > Education & Reference

Amazon > Books > Subjects > History > World > Religious > Religion, Politics & State

PriceZombie > Books